Thursday, November 26, 2009
What I find amazing is that the Associated Press is running this 'embarassing' article about the BO Admin. AND, by adding in up pictures of this couple posing with Katie & Old Joe, it makes fools of them too. Shows how easily they can be duped.
Oh it was a State Dinner. I didn't understand the Indian accent.
Oh well, I didn’t find anything particularly extraordinary about the First Lady’s dress and the President looked a tad uncomfortable in his tux. James Bond he ain’t.
I’m sure all the unemployed people who watched TV coverage of “Michelle and Barry’s Super Terrific Happy Hour,” while eating Spaghetti-O’s out of a can, were soooooo thrilled that First Lady “M” and Her Big Butt looked so fabulous in that *&^^%$# hideous dress. In fact she looks like Patrick Ewing in drag
Please, please, someone get Michelle on What Not To Wear. Let Stacy and Clinton have at her! Give up the vegetable garden (I’m surprised she didn’t show up in overalls and a straw hat). If she wants to be an example to millions, show the world people can learn to choose the right clothes for the right occasions.
And what was with that couple than slipped by Security! Or was it just another half-brother of Obama's?
How can anyone in this country feel safe from terrorist attacks when not only are our military bases susceptible but our White House is as well? This shows once again that Comrade Barry and his staff are incompetent boobs. This whole circus tent, made for media show was a foolish waste of borrowed-from-China funds. This scam was just the gravy on the turkey.
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
I wish you and all of yours a blessed Thanksgiving.
We do stand together, and we will not waiver. No matter what "The One" thinks!
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
Those who voted Obama in do not keep up with current events which can also elevate his poll numbers. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. We have to get these folks dumped.
Millions of Americans need to decide that we need to elect Constitution-loving patriots who will strictly abide by the limits of that document, and begin dismantling "programs" that are in violation of it; even if it hurts. Americans that understand that the only thing we want from our government is to protect our homeland, and stay out of our way while we use our liberty to improve our own lives and the lives of those whom we love. Yes, Obama did it. But, people won't fall for the Phoney a second time. Obama, Pelosi, and Reid are NOT stupid people (in spite of what we'd like to believe) But neither are the majority of the American people.
Sunday, October 11, 2009
While I agree that the DNC has a good argument for tracing its origins back to the Democratic-Republican Party of Jefferson & Madison, since it is the sole surviving splinter faction from the 1824 election, it is disingenuous at best to make the connections you are attempting to do. Slavery was not an issue upon which the DRP was founded, nor was it an issue that drove wedges between political parties of the late 1700s and very early 1800s. Again, I’m speaking solely of the politics of the era of Jefferson, Madison & Hamilton. To make the leap you are doing in scoring a cheap political point against the modern DNC by tarring both Jefferson & Madison over something neither had a hand in (at least not more so than ALL the Founders) makes a mockery of history. In doing this you are also, ironically, borrowing a portion of a tactic the extreme Left uses to discredit ALL the Founders as nothing more than rich, white, male, racist, sexist, blah, blah, blah. The DRP had economic and political differences with the Federalists. Slavery was not among the major issues dividing these early parties. There were Federalists who supported slavery and those who opposed it, just like there were Democratic-Republicans who supported and opposed it. Ditto for the Whigs.
Both the DNC and GOP have evolved over the years, straying in some ways from their origins, and both have elements of Jeffersonianism and Hamiltonianism in them to varying degrees. The modern DNC may have a claim of lineage to the DRP, but cannot say it holds to all of that defunct party’s original views. Don’t believe me? Okay, let’s look at the major differences between Jefferson and Hamilton and how they might apply to today’s political landscape:
1. Which modern party supports a strong central government and which one favors a smaller Federal government, at least in theory? Jefferson held the latter view while Hamilton held the former.
2. Which modern party claims to favor states rights, at least in theory? Jefferson favored states rights while Hamilton did not.
3. Which modern party favors strong government oversight of banking? Today’s issue is somewhat different than what Jefferson and Hamilton argued about regarding the establishment of a Bank of the United States, but a reasonable argument can be made from their positions on that issue. Jefferson would probably oppose strong Federal oversight of banking today while Hamilton would probably support it. One can also surmise that both Jefferson AND Hamilton would be less likely to support Federal involvement in private business that we see today, though for differing reasons.
4. Which modern party holds to a broad interpretation of the Constitution and which one favors a narrow, or “strict”, approach? Jefferson argued for a narrow interpretation which favored states rights while the Hamilton favored a broad view that favored the national government at the expense of the states.
Jefferson & Madison are as much a part of the GOP’s political heritage, in philosophy at least, as Hamilton is part of the DNC’s. Neither modern party can be said to be “pure Jeffersonian” or “pure Hamiltonian”. The issues of their time differ from those of ours even though elements of their disagreements can be found in modern political discourse.
The defectors, who were seeking to fly to Miami, were briefly detained at the airport, and paid USD 5,200 to have their passports stamped and be allowed to board a flight bound to the United States. "We collected money among the seven doctors who were detained and we finally managed to travel," Jesús Peralta, 26, one of the defectors, told El Nuevo Herald newspaper
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Well I have news for these liberal hypocrites. They did and still do exist.
The U.S. Secret Service is investigating a "poll" posted on Facebook that asked users the most unsocial, unspeakable question: Should President Obama be assassinated?
Facebook users and the national media are wringing their hands over the appalling poll that was posted on Facebook asking users if Barack Obama should be assassinated. Facebook has since taken down the poll, created by a third party user Several groups on Facebook are dedicated to the demise of George W. Bush. Most of the dozen or so groups dedicated to killing him however, have only a few followers, but some of them
Facebook doesn't seem to have taken down the sites promoting killing former President Bush even though the Secret Service is supposed to investigate threats to past presidents as well. It looks like several people aren't doing their jobs equally.
First of all, was it even considered that this person could be a liberal trying to scam conservatives and make them look bad?
The whole poin is that whoever did this was no doubt a crack-pot and we are making a moutain over a moehill. This was not a threat to the president and everyone knows that.
I performed a quick Google search and I found the following:
I found several groups on Facebook are dedicated to the demise of George W. Bush. Most of the dozen or so groups dedicated to killing him however, have only a few followers, but some of them have become quite popular.
For example there is a group named "We all Want To Kill George Bush" with 429 members, and LETS KILL BUSH WITH SHOES has 484 members.
Another A quick search for any threatening groups towards Bill Clinton resulted in the fact that he got off the hook, but his wife Hillary has earned a few threatening fans such as the members of the group "Kill Hillary" and "If Hillary Clinton is Elected, I'm shooting her."
So as you can see this is not anything new.
Definitely all groups and weirdos plotting or even suggesting to kill anybody should be removed and reported to the proper authorities. But lets not get so excited and put the blame on Rightwing extremists when it's os clear that this is the act of a nutjob Right or left wing.
And by the way, am I the only person in the world without a facebook account?
As for Our Dear leader, I can list more than 20 things I’m upset with Our Dear leader for. None are as serious as his inexcusable delay at protecting and helping our troops in Afghanistan.
For example, The Department of Justice is now an arm of the Democrat’s political operations, dropping charges against allies (Black Panthers, Bill Richardson) while conducting politically-motivated investigations of CIA interrogators.
- Despite claims of moderation and centrism, the president has surrounded himself with advisers - Van Jones, Cass Susstein, John Holdren, Mark Lloyd - from the extreme fringe of the left.
- He is the first president to side with Marxist dictators (Chavez, Morales, and Castro) against an American ally, Honduras.
- He has fired or threatened to fire Inspectors General who expose the corruption of his cronies
- He has proposed or enacted exactly zero policies based on free market principles.
His choice to lead the men and women in that theater asked for more troops ONE MONTH ago!!!! 48,000 more in a surge to turn the tide of battle in Afghanistan. Our current administration is playing politics with the lives of our soldiers. Obama has convinced his hirelings to not publicly forward the request as he “studies” the situation. The General has asked for more troops and while Our Dear Leader is thinking about it he finds it more important to take a trip to Denmark next week to lobby the International Olympic committee about having the Olympics in Chicago he has time to take a trip to Denmark to promote another Chicago event ..... What is more important? DOESN’T it bother you that our president doesn't have time to talk with General McCrystal about saving lives in Afghanistan?
Could you imagine the outrage if Bush did this?
The Iranian’s are launching missiles, and he's running to Denmark to talk about Sports! Thus he doesn't have the time to meet with Generals concerning Afghanistan? Meanwhile, our young men and women are dying in Afghanistan. Gotta love the priorities with this administration.
Here’s a little known fact for you folks to think about. We are at war in Afghanistan for about 7 years Obama has been in office for 9 months now and look at these statistics.
More than one-third of all US casualties in Afghanistan have happened since Obama took the oath of office on January 20th! Amazing!
Obama is the most divisive President since Richard Nixon. But don’t tell that to your liberal friends, they will spin it like a top. They will tell you how The Magic Negro mad History and how he’s going to save the whole world. HOW? By kissing up to them? By bowing to the Arab Kings? Or by having a beer with everyone that he has embarrassed.
And while you are thinking about that, let me throw this one out to you.. Obama is responsible for more government spending than all of his previous Presidents’ spending combined
Our men and women in arms are being shot at and killed while their commander in chief dawdles and delays wondering what to do. It’s inexcusable. Man up Mr President, make a decision!!! Chicken. Coward. Liberal Democrat. I’m embarrassed.
Saturday, September 12, 2009
Last year, America elected a president with an obvious and personal dislike for the nation itself. When you think about it, why would the IOC bestow upon such a country the honor of hosting the enitre world?
And so now the list grows yet again, and Obama’s up to a full dozen:
Trinidad and Tobago
I don’t see how this country can survive another 3+ years of Obama. The sheer incompetence of this man if breathtaking. How did we ever let this pathetic self centered little momma’s boy be elected? And that wife of his, fashion icon????
Friday, September 11, 2009
Ronald Reagan was the greatest President of the twentieth century. He is the patron saint of conservatives in El Salvador. We will have to wait one hundred years for another great one to come along.
Obama is the first president of the New Order. We are in the power consolidation period in which the sheeple require many more dogs to herd them than will be the case when the power of the New Order is in place.
Wednesday, September 2, 2009
Liberals elected an extreme narcissist to the potus (lower-case reflecting Bamroid's stature) who also has a hefty dose of displacement in his make (as do all liberals). The definition of "displacement" is the transmission an emotion from its previous or initial focal point to another person, situation, or item. The communists and the nazis used this well as do current dictators like Chavez (US is evil), Ahmadinejad (US is evil), and liberals (US is evil). Indeed, weak-minded liberals, who are insecure at their core and liars through and through use "displacement" to hide the truth (like tossing out a red herring) that makes the situation more palatable to their delusional grasp on reality. For example, take the Banking Queen, Dodd, and the liberals in general, and what they did during the meltdown. Blame Bush. Blame the GOP. Blame CEOs. Blame ANYONE or ANYTHING except who really did it. Frank, Dodd, and all of the liberals involved with Fannie and Freddie, i.e., Gorelick, David, etc. Perhaps worse than that was the GOP bending over and accepting the blame vice going after the libs with a vengeance. In another example, the geezer who shot the two guards in the Holocaust museum was referred to as a right-wing nut except it turns out that he's a SOCIALIST AND a anti-Jew, anti-Christian kook. Somehow, the Lapdog media missed that follow-up. The murderer of 60,000 babies gets whacked and sent to H*ll? Right wingers did it. BJ Bubba can't keep his zipper zipped? The vast Right Wing Conspiracy did it. Dan Blather called Dallas a city of hate and tried to pin JFK's assassination on the right but unfortunately, Oswald was a commie. If one reads through the Warren Report, Ol Earl blames it on a heavy concentration of Republicans in Dallas that FORCED Oswald to shoot Kennedy. Deep thinkers these libs. (For a great read on this subject, check out Goldberg's, "Liberal Fascism.")
Indeed, Reagan walks away from Reyjavik and the liberals freak out but the wall comes down. Reagan labeled a cowboy for it. Carter allows the Soviets to assassinate the US Ambassador in Kabul w/o even an angry note in protest and the liberals invite him to the DNC every year. Displacement at work. Reagan is baaaaaaaaaaaad, Carter is gooooooooooood. Wilson, the first REAL lib fascist cracks down on civil liberties but its all gooooooooood. Bush cracks down on terrorism and its baaaaaaad. FDR imposes a Ponzi Scam on us and its gooooooooood. Republicans want to reform it, that's baaaaaaaaaad. LBJ murders 50,000 GI's in a war he profited from (and lost) and that's gooooooooooood. Bush liberates two countries and whacks a bunch of bad guys and that's baaaaaaaaaad. Now the Goebbelesque Lapdog Media has assisted Comrade Barry to glom onto the Wilson-FDR-JFK-LBJ-Carter-BJ Bubba myth of competent liberal leadership with a fervor that is only topped by Ms. Riefenstahl, Hitler's main propagandist.
Anyone else see the pattern here? Something bad happens and the libs blame someone or something else...FAST! The Lapdog media moves in like greased lightning to muddle the waters instead of exposing it. Liberals hate America because they politicize things like JFK's assassination to make the GOP somehow complacent in it. They hate America when, as Rahmbutt the Ballerina Emmanuel stated: "You never want a good crisis to go to waste." In other words, screw the people suffering in the crisis, let's use it to gain more power. To implement our dream of socialism. What an a**stain. To the leftist vermin, "the end justifies the means," they screw the people, and the Lapdog Media gets the assist by blaming the GOP, right-wingers, the VRWC, etc.
Liberals hate America because they fail to subscribe to the American Dream. They simply refuse to take care of themselves, their needs, their issues, and then they compound THAT by failing to comprehend why they should HAVE to take care of themselves. They seek, need, and want a cradle-to-grave government cared for existence and they want it for US as well, whether we like it or not. THAT is the height of their arrogance and hatred. Anything not "blessed" off on by a government bureaucrat is baddddddddddd. They embraced an idiot by the name of Martin Sheen who PLAYED a potus on the tube and a spokeswoman named Cindy Sheethead, and gave comfort and aid to our enemies in a time of war, something they've been doing since the 60's. Liberals hate America. They must because they rooted for the enemy to WIN in Iraq merely to get back at Bush. The NY Obama Times routinely gives our enemies the benefit of the doubt while excoriating Bush, Cheney, the Right, the military, and all things American. Hollywood, chock full of limo-libs, could not make enough movies (that failed miserably at the box office) showing the troops to be evildoers and the peace-loving terrorists only sawed off heads because they were forced to. Oh yeah, and movies that called Bush a liar, evil, stupid, etc. Liberals seek safety, security, and government succor by any means necessary and in doing that, they eschew freedom, liberals, and their own individuality, as won for them by our Founding Fathers and legions of veterans since 1776. Sam Adams nailed liberals to the tree with this quote: "If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, — go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!" Please libs, go from us ASAP. You disgust us.
The hatred of America by liberals is no more evident when they denounce America every day, with every breath, exuding hatred for us'ns in "flyover country" even as they travel where they want to, buy what they want to, live as they want to, speak out as they want to, whine, bleat, and moan like they want to, and they can't understand that America has provided this for them! They hate anyone who disagrees with their socialist vision of a utopia in America, where every ill, need, want, desire, yearning, craving, etc, is catered to by the government, is immediately attacked as a racist, a hater, someone who refuses to support Dopey, heedless to the EIGHT YEARS they scumbagged, obfuscated, and blocked Bush! The hatred of the liberals knows only one solution and that is, their fellow travelers to control our government forever. Why else would Dopey and crew seize the census? In order to gerrymander districts to rig the vote. Unamerican. The epitome of the liberal hatred towards America and Americans. Real Americans that is.
George Bush was NOT a Conservative but rather, a RINO. Libs should have loved him like they love McShamnesty, Snowe, Collins, SPECTURD, etc, but they hate him. Why? Bush, for all of his faults, made his decisions based on reason not polls (like BJ Bubba did and Dopey now does) and he actually TOOK the blame for things, exemplifying personal responsibility and accountability (something the Left flees from), and he extolled God and stated he actually prayed! OH THE HUMANITY! The hatred of Bush by the libs reaching epidemic proportions and they actually named it BDS (Bush Derangement Syndrome). The liberals successfully "displaced" Bush and thus were able to take the focus off of their failed policies dating back to FDR! The liberals implemented "Plan Displacement" and were able to remain safely in their cocoon, free from any analysis, or examination of their beliefs, values, or actions, and could snipe at Bush from sidelines, like third-stringers do. Even Waxman helping terrorists in Fallujah with Code Pink sailed under the radar. But when they put their spikes on, they're weak. Comrade Barry is the perfect example of that and more. Indeed, the idiot is STILL on the campaign trail! Playing potus.
The bottom line is that liberals hate America because they refuse to see the difference between good and evil. The Democrats not only embrace vermin like Mikey Mooreon, they invite him to their convention and seat him next to Jimmy the Dhimmi! They embrace scum like Cindy Sheethead and pseudo-American Indian Ward Churchill, both of all of whom hate America. Comrade Barry could not wait to release classified stuff to the enemy and then Nazi Pelosi openly attacks the CIA. Liberals hate America. Just ask yourself WHO SUPPORTS: NO prayer in school, h0m0s serving openly in the military, reparations, h0m0 weddings, NAMBLA, ACLU, bestiality, legalized drugs, freeing criminals like Tookie and Mumia, cRap music, impeaching Bush, blaming Bush for 9/11, scumbagged the US military (ABSCAM Murtha), protested the War in Iraq (before, during, and after), election fraud via ACORN, no drilling, no new refineries, no drilling in ANWR, no nuclear power plants, a "gradual" rise in gas prices, etc, etc, ad nauseum? Liberals do, that's who. Liberals hate America, and they hate what it stands for. Liberals are pro-abortion, pro-death, pro-gay, pro-enemy, and anti-Constitution. They don’t love freedoms, they embrace slavery. Liberals don't see America as the "shining city on the hill," they see it as the dungeon that mistreats: h0m0s, blacks, minorities, women, the poor, the homeless, the weak, the stupid, the lazy, etc. To libs, we're greedy imperialists who go around the world bullying other countries in their own self interest and therefore, must be punished. WE. MUST. SUFFER. And if we fall in the process, good.
In closing, there is a rising movement of Americans and patriots who are dedicated and rededicating themselves to America and are working to save this nation from the leftist vermin. We MUST reject the lies and disinformation that is the modern liberal movement as practiced by Comrade Barry and ABC (All Barry Channel) News, now broadcasting from the White House like Pravda, along with NBC (Now Barry Channel) and CBS (Continual Barry Surveillance) news pushing the rookie like a demigod. Quite the switch from their coverage of Bush! We must continue to resist the left through endorsing Conservatives in politics, joining Tea Parties (the left HATES THEM), vocalizing our distaste of the current regime, and refusing to hold our noses for the GOP RINOS anymore. As Ghandi stated: "First they ignore us, then they laugh at us, then they fight us, then we win!" We're already at the fighting stage when clowns like Comrade Barry try to order private citizens like Dr Basso to the White House because Basso did a "Tom Paine" video excoriating Barry. Get used to it Jug Ears, our dander is up.
Thursday, August 13, 2009
Instead of referencing this nation’s achievements in the 232 1/2 years prior to his inauguration, Mr. Obama tells us what he has done since he took office.
He may talk about “responsibly ending a war” in Iraq, but he doesn’t mention the word, victory, nor the tyrant we overthrew, a tyrant who, by the way, had repeatedly snubbed his nose at the United Nations, you know, the institution he was addressing.
He does not mention how we helped liberate a continent from fascist tyranny. And the only time he mentions the President who led us to that great victory (a word absent from his discourse) was to reference his “vision for this institution” (i.e., the United Nations).Nor did mention how Presidents of both parties stood strong against communism and for freedom, waging and subsequently winning the Cold War, bringing down the Iron Curtain and bringing freedom and economic growth to the long-suffering peoples of central and eastern Europe. Well, he did reference the Cold War, just once, reminding us that it was “long-gone.” Does he even appreciate how American policies made that so?
I’m sure many presidents dream of being added to Mt. Rushmore. Obama is the first to want to re-shape every head to match his. Unfortunately, none of the heads are big enough.
Tuesday, August 11, 2009
Freedom of expression is one of the most fundamental rights that individuals enjoy. It is fundamental to the existence of democracy and the respect of human dignity. It is also one of the most dangerous rights, because freedom of expression means the freedom to express one's discontent with the status quo and the desire to change it. As such, it is one of the most threatened rights, with governments - and even human rights groups - all over the world constantly trying to curtail it.The United States, probably like no other nation, has recognized the importance of freedom of expression to safeguard democracy and grow as a nation. However, this does not mean there are no efforts to try to curtail it. The internet has often been the target of this efforts, as it provides practically everyone with the ability to communicate their ideas to wide audiences and escapes the ability of the state to control it